Love Island USA has taken over our screens this summer with a fiery Season 7 that’s been impossible to ignore. From fan-favorite stans riding hard for their picks to problematic eliminations handled with little transparency, the show has become the cultural conversation of the season, unapologetically. But beyond the challenges and slow-motion kisses lies something much more telling: a mirror reflecting how we view gender, emotion, and power in relationships.
So what’s really going on with Love Island USA?
At first glance, it seems like harmless fun: a group of attractive singles placed in a sun-soaked villa, coupling up to stay in the game. Each week brings new challenges, “bombshell” contestants, and recoupling ceremonies where islanders must decide whether to stay loyal or switch it up. Midway through the season, Casa Amor arrives, splitting the cast and tempting them with a brand-new lineup of singles. The public plays puppet master, voting on their favorite couples and individuals. And all of it is wrapped in cheeky narration that directs how we, the audience, are supposed to feel.
But the structure of the show – while dressed up as a dating experiment – quietly reinforces outdated gender norms. Men are celebrated for taking their time, “thinking things through,” and keeping their options open. Women, on the other hand, are punished for being too expressive, too affectionate, too emotional. The message is clear: male ambiguity is strategic, female vulnerability is unstable and embarrassing.
No contestants have embodied this dynamic more than Huda Mustafa and Amaya Espinal, two of the most talked-about women of the season.
Huda, a Palestinian-American fitness influencer from Charlotte, was initially dragged online for being “too much” – overinvested in her connection with Jeremiah and emotionally reactive when it didn’t pan out. Commenters picked apart everything from her physical appearance to her personality, asking why she was acting like she was on a show about… love? But once she was paired with Chris, the narrative shifted. Suddenly, Huda became a fan-favorite, a woman finding her footing after heartbreak. It’s a perfect example of how female contestants must redeem themselves for simply wanting clarity and commitment.
Then there’s Amaya Espinal, a Dominican New Yorker who wears her heart on her sleeve. Amaya became a flashpoint during the “Stand On Business” challenge, where contestants anonymously called each other out. Ace (a contestant I had to scoff at when he declared himself a leader) claimed she crossed his boundaries by calling him “babe.” His remark sparked a debate about emotional expression, intent, and cultural context.
Amaya was criticized for being “too affectionate,” while Ace was positioned as the rational one for setting boundaries. But fellow contestant Bryan stepped in to defend her, contextualizing her behavior within Latino culture, where affectionate nicknames are a sign of warmth, not disrespect. In a rare moment of cultural awareness on the show, Bryan named the double standard: Amaya wasn’t being difficult. She was being herself, and that should have been enough for someone actually interested in her.
And yet, she was asked to explain, justify, and shrink, which, true to herself, she refused to do.
Amaya’s impassioned defense of her emotional character quickly shifted her place on the show to #1 most genuine.
Meanwhile, the men of the show (Ace and his crew in particular) have largely escaped scrutiny. Many online attributed Jeremiah’s early exit to being outplayed by the “Ace Gang,” who maneuvered to protect their social dominance. Viewers have noted how easily the show allows toxic male behavior to fly under the radar, while women are held responsible for maintaining peace, controlling their emotions, and never appearing too invested. Even fan favorites like Olandria, Chelley, and Cierra faced backlash for ganging up on Amaya during the aforementioned challenge instead of calling out the men whose behavior set the tone.
In this ecosystem, women who lead with emotion are ridiculed. Men who lead with detachment are rewarded.
But outside the villa, the tides are shifting. According to Bumble’s latest survey of over 40,000 daters worldwide, nearly two-thirds (64%) of women say they’re crystal clear about what they want in a partner – and are refusing to settle. Emotional stability now ranks as a top priority, with 59% of women saying they want someone steady, honest, and grounded. And it’s working: 87% of Bumble users report that dating is helping them connect more intentionally and build confidence along the way.
The research also reveals that the future is a real part of the dating equation. A full 95% of singles say concerns around finances, career, and climate are shaping who, and how, they date. For 27% of women, those conversations are happening earlier than ever.
In other words, women want clarity. They want emotional depth. They want honesty. And they’re building relationships that reflect that.
Meanwhile, Love Island USA continues to reward confusion, miscommunication, and emotional withholding, especially from men. The show remains obsessed with the performance of romance, while real-world daters are calling for the real thing.
We deserve dating shows that reflect the dating world we’re actually living in – one where emotional expression isn’t a liability, where women aren’t punished for wanting more, and where “vulnerability” doesn’t mean a man finally admitting he likes someone after weeks of stringing them along.
If this season has shown us anything, it’s that audiences are paying attention. And we’re not interested in love stories that only work when women stay quiet.